Friday, August 1, 2008

Supervillains

A little over a year ago, while I was hammering away at another blog on sheer crap-titude of the movie 300 , I put forth a list of rules that make a superhero movie successful. One of those rules was that the supervillain had to be somewhat sympathetic. The idea is that a bad guy you can sympathize with is the scariest kind of bad guy, because if you can relate their point of view, you are easier to seduce, and thus emotionally complicit with some of the acts they commit. Like all rules, this one should be tested rigorously for validity, so I submit to you the profile of three villains making some waves in recent pop culture as case study for the Sympathetic Supervillain rule.

Case Study #1 - Dr Horrible, from Dr. Horrible's Sing-A-Long Blog.

Pro's
  • good singer;
  • sweetly goofy;
  • has nice taste in women;
  • has an underdog quality that make you wanna root for him;
  • wants to change the world
Con's
  • wants to change the world, but through evil;
  • his arch nemesis is a pretty-boy, prima-donna lunkhead;
  • embrace of video blogging makes it easy to foil evil schemes;
  • has supremely bad timing with women.
It's not hard to sympathize with Dr. Horrible. Even though he's the bad guy, we still root for him, because he... is Us. He's the put-downable, the down-trodded-ed, the nerd who always gets beaten and never gets the girl. At some point in our lives (oh, like in high school, maybe?) we've all been Dr. Horrible.

We get him.

We are him.

That's what makes the first two episodes of Dr. Horrible's Sing-A-Long Blog so charming (the acting, and song-writing should be commended). And that's what makes the last episode so sad. The turn of events in the last episode gets the viewer, because the viewer has invested a lot of sympathy in... with... Dr. Horrible, we root for him as the underdog, and then in the final act, we feel partially responsible with the consequences of his actions.

Overall the series is short, but really affecting, and as a villain, Dr. Horrible is pretty compelling.

Case Study #2 - Dexter, from Dexter.


Pro's
  • really, really clean;
  • really, really good at his job;
  • really, really good boyfriend, brother and father-surrogate;
  • really, really good with scalpels and power tools.
Con's
  • serial killer in his spare time;
  • has a dark raging black hole of a soul that is periodically filled by the torment of his victims;
  • lives in Miami.
Dexter: forensics expert by day, serial killer by night. But get this... he's a good serial killer. He only goes after others like him.

Funny enough, the things that makes Dexter a great killer are the same things we look for in a comic superhero. He's charming, efficient and good at bringing evil-doer's to justice. Well... only if you consider "justice" to be torture, dismemberment and burial in a deep sea grave. He has his mild-mannered alter ego (quirky but efficient blood-splatter expert for the Miami police by day), he has a costume (when Dexter hunts, he's prone to wearing black jeans, black knit-shirts and black hoodies), and a nifty utility belt (his medical tools are housed in a really nice, tan, leather satchel). In many ways the conceit of the TV show Dexter is a deconstruction of the typical superhero story. The tension in the story lies not in rationalizing the various violent acts Dexter commits. It lies in the common superhero trope: Will Dexter's boss, family, girlfriend find out what he does in the dark watches of the night?

We sympathize with Dexter through his plight. He, like we, has secrets that we fear might alarm polite society. The funny thing is, as each episode goes by, we come to realize that the other people in Dexter's world, his sister, his co-workers, his lover, maybe even his father, have deep dark secrets that pale next his his own.

Case Study #3 - The Joker, from The Dark Knight.


Pro's
  • uh... none!
Con's
  • designed to evoke your antipathy;
  • twitching, asymmetrical posture
  • diseased facial paint and scarring,
  • dissonant voice from Perdition,
  • greasy hair (you can practically see the bugs flying around amongst the strands).
Despite the Con's, for some reason, people love the Joker. He's sexy. Hell, even Batman can find it in himself to kill the him, despite the fact the Joker more than deserves it.

The question is why. Why is the Joker so compelling?

Maybe because we're attracted to power. Maybe we're attracted to the dark things. The Joker amoral, anarchic and totally devoid of simple human empathy. He is the Batman's complete psychological Other. While Batman has a rational origin, the Joker is irrationality brought life. It's as if Gotham City itself organically hatched a maniacal Dionysus in response the Batman Apollonian existence. In other words, The Joker is the city, the environment balancing it's scales. Maybe we're attracted to Joker because were attracted to the same irrationality that resides within us. Maybe the Batman saves the Joker in the end because he... (read: "we")... need him.

To paraphrase Alan Moore, without the Joker, the Batman is just some nutcase who shows up to a brawl wearing a mask with pointy ears. Keep in mind even while fighting to uphold societies laws, the Batman, a vigilante, breaks them. The notion of superheroism cannot support itself for long unless you got some really, crazy, clown distracting the general population from the fact that you are just a slightly less crazy goon.

So my friends, send in the clowns! Send in the charming killers, the hatchers of evil-plots, and the doer's of manic misdeeds. Call them "villains" if you must, but know this... to someone, somewhere... they are the true hero's.